Wednesday, March 7, 2018

Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle - Chuck Wheaton

Help Save The Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle

03.07.2018
Chuck Wheaton
Bio 227
Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo

Ecology  

Physical Description
The Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle or the Lepidochelys kempii are the most critically endangered of all sea turtles, they are also the smallest of all sea turtles. The adults can weigh between 75 and 100 Lbs and can reach lengths of only 48 inches. These turtles have small rounded, olive and gray colored shells and a triangular shaped head. When hatched, these turtles are gray and black, but as they grow into adult turtles their plastron (underside of the shell) fades from darker colors into greenish white, their skin becomes creamy and white, and their shells become olive gray to green.
Diet
The Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle’s diet mainly consists of blue crab, jellyfish, mollusks, and fish but they also are known to be adaptive eaters.
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Eggs
(Photo via Endangered Species Project, 2013)
Life Span
These turtles can live for up to 45 years of age.
Number of turtles today
Estimated between 1000 -10,000       
Taxonomy        
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: Cheloniidae
Family: Lepidochelys
Genus: Kempii  
Nesting
The Kemp’s Ridleys Sea Turtle can lay up to 100 eggs at a time! They also lay eggs in large groups called “arribada”. These turtles have an incubation period can be from 48-62 days, throughout the months of March-June. They lay the smallest eggs of all sea turtles, about the size of a ping-pong ball. Females can mother 2-3 nests in a season and more than 95% of the entire population nests near Rancho Nuevo, Tamaulipas, Mexico. These turtles reach sexual maturity at around the age of 10 years old.
(Video via Sea Turtle Inc.)


Turtles nesting in an arribada in Rancho Nuevo, Tamaulipas, Mexico.  (Photo via The Herald, Brownsville)



The red is the population distribution of the Kemps Ridley 
(Photo via U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

Species Distribution
These turtles can be found from the Gulf of Mexico to the Atlantic Ocean. They migrate from the Gulf of Mexico to the New England waters in warmer conditions. The Kemp’s tend to say closer to shore, as they are neritic, which means they prefer shallow areas. They can be found in lagoons and bays as well. You can see the nesting site on Google Earth here: https://conserveturtles.org/information-about-sea-turtles-kemps-ridley-sea-turtle/
Population and Geographic Changes
In the 1940’s, it was said that more than 100,000 Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtles would come on the shore and nest
in a single day, but by the 80’s there were only a couple hundred turtles spotted nesting a season. Today the population is estimated in be between 1,000 and 10,000 nest females.
Listing Date and Type of Listing
The Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtles was listed as “critically endangered” on December 2nd, 1970 and has been
under the ESA protection since that time. However, the official approved recovery plan was not published
until 2011                                                                                                                     
Threats of the Kemp’s Ridleys Sea Turtle
The largest threat to the Kemp’s Ridleys Sea Turtle is human interference. Originally, there was a large exploitation of the Kemp’s Ridleys eggs from the 1940’s to the 1960’s. Before the harvesting of these eggs, these turtles were seen in nesting groups upwards of 40,000 thousand (as seen in the video). After this, the Mexican and American governments outlawed the harvesting of the eggs. These turtles hit an all-time low in nesting numbers in 1985 with a total of 702 turtles laying eggs in Rancho Nuevo and between the years of 1978 and 1991, there were only about 200 sea turtles seen nesting a year. Today the population remains under very strict protection and are showing signs in the early stages of full recovery.  However, these turtles are still a bycatch product of commercial fishermen, they become caught in shrimp trawls, longlines, gill nets, traps, and pots. They also end up tangled in trash and fishing line and are unable to surface and therefore drown.
Conservation Efforts
The U.S. and Mexican Government have been making strong efforts to protect the Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle. The second version of the Bi-National Recovery Plan for the Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle, published and approved in 2011, includes an extensive plan to see out this creature’s recovery.
Bi-National Recovery Plan for the Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle
This Recovery Plan is broken down into 3 recovery elements. Recovery Goals, Recovery Strategy, and Recovery Criteria.
  1. Recovery Goals
The goal of the Recovery program is to protect the Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle to the point that protection under the Endangered Species Act is no longer necessary.
  1. Recovery Strategy
There are a couple strategies that have been put in place to help conserve the Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle. The first is to continue using strategies that have proven to work in the past. This includes protecting their native habitat, protecting nesting females, and protecting their respective nests. In the ocean, fisheries are required to use Turtle Exclusion Devices, (TED’s) that help fishies find and avoid turtle bycatch. The strategies also include monitoring the turtle’s breeding, migration, nesting, and eating habits to better know and predict the turtle's behavior and react accordingly. Lastly, to ensure the survival of these turtles, the plan includes implementing educational programs to inform the public and community about the nature and history of these animals.
  1. Recovery Criteria
Recovery Criteria is listed into two separate segments, Downlisting Criteria and Delisting Criteria, each of which are broken Demographic Criteria and Listing Factor Criteria.   
  1. Downlisting Criteria
Demographic
To be downlisted on the endangered species list, there needs to be at least 10,000 nesting females documented in a nesting season on their main nesting beaches, which are Rancho Nuevo, Tepehuajes, and Playa Dos. There also must be 300,000 documented hatchings that make it into the water in a single nesting season.
Listing Factor
The Listing Factor Criteria entails five factors including threatened habitat range, overutilization, disease, the inadequacy of human mechanism, and natural or manmade factors. These are the factors that have contributed to the listing of the Kemp’s Ridleys Sea Turtle, and they cannot be downlisted until these factors have been addressed and the demographic criteria for downlisting have been met. However, the plan has addressed these factors and put teams together to identify man-made and natural factors that are affecting this species.        
  1. Delisting Criteria
Demographic
For the complete removal of these turtles off the endangered species list, there must be 40,000 nesting females on their primary nesting beach per season in a six-year period. There have been methods in use to ensure correct counting of nesting females.
Listing Factors  
The listing factors for the complete removal of the species from the Endangered Species list is similar to the downlisting factors of threatened habitat range, overutilization, disease, an inadequacy of human mechanism, and natural or manmade factors. However, the difference lies in that these listing factors will not be satisfied until the demographic criteria for delisting have been met.
Actions Taken
Below is a summarization of the actions needed to be taken as said by theBi-National Recovery Plan for the Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle”.
  • Protect and manage nesting and marine habitats
  • Protect and manage populations on the nesting beaches and in the marine environment
  • Maintain a stranding network  
  • Manage captive stocks  
  • Educate the public  
  • Develop community partnerships
  • Maintain and develop local, state, and national government partnerships  
  • Maintain, promote awareness of, and expand U.S. and Mexico laws  
  • Implement international agreements
  • Enforce laws in the marine and terrestrial environment and in the marketplace         
When Will They Be Recovered?
According to the Bi-National Recovery Plan for the Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle has seen a growth rate on 19% a season since conservations efforts have been taken, and if this trend continues, this endangered species could be delisted in 2024.

(Photo via National Park Service)




What can you do?
Sea turtles often times mistake plastic in the ocean for jellyfish and choke. You can help protect the Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle by reducing your waste and disposing of it properly so. You can also avoid buying products made from turtle parts. Products like jewelry, guitars, and small souvenirs are made from turtle shells sold to tourists all around the world. You can also avoid buying products the use turtle oil and turtle skin, which are popular in some parts of the world. These products have a devastating effect on the protection efforts of the Kemp Ridley Sea Turtles and helping lower the demand for these products can and will help the recovery cause. You can also donate to send a turtle to rehab at the World Wildlife Foundation at https://live.adyen.com/hpp/pay.shtml!

Resources

Works Cited
904-731-3332, Public Affairs Office NFESO. “Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle (Lepidochelys Kempii).” Official Web Page of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 7 Feb. 2018, www.fws.gov/northflorida/seaturtles/turtle%20factsheets/kemps-ridley-sea-turtle.htm.
Fisheries, NOAA. “Kemp's Ridley Turtle (Lepidochelys Kempii).” NOAA Fisheries, NOAA, 15 May 2014, www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/turtles/kempsridley.html#taxonomy.
Indenbaum, Rosa. “High Demand for Sea Turtle Products.” Defenders of Wildlife Blog, Defenders of Wildlife, 21 Mar. 2016, defendersblog.org/2016/03/five-ways-market/.
“Information About Sea Turtles: Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle – Sea Turtle Conservancy.” Sea Turtle Conservancy, Sea Turtle Conservancy, 2017, conserveturtles.org/information-about-sea-turtles-kemps-ridley-sea-turtle/.
“Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle.” Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle, Sea Turtles Inc., www.seaturtleinc.org/education/about-sea-turtles/kemps-ridley/.
“The Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle.” National Parks Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, 17 Oct. 2015, www.nps.gov/pais/learn/nature/kridley.htm.
“Kemp's Ridley Turtle.” WWF Global, WWF, 2017, wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/endangered_species/marine_turtles/kemps_ridley_turtle/.
“Kemp’s Ridleys Gather at Rancho Nuevo to Lay Eggs.” The Herald, The Herald, Brownsville, Texas, 6 June 2018, www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/local/article_88b9572a-d7c6-11e2-b9e7-001a4bcf6878.html?mode=image&photo=0.
Lemiec, Gail. “Aquarium Caring for Injured Sea Turtles.” North Carolina Aquarium, North Carolina Aquarium, 5 Dec. 2015, seaturtleexploration.com/aquarium-caring-for-injured-sea-turtles/.
Moran, and Kinsolving. “The Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle .” Endangered Species Project, 2013, www.drakehs.org/academics/seadisc/endangeredspecies/2013/kemps%20ridley/website%20files/conservationefforts.html.
National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and SEMARNAT. 2011. BiNational Recovery Plan for the Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle (Lepidochelys kempii), Second Revision. National Marine Fisheries Service. Silver Spring, Maryland 156 pp. + appendices.
Sea Turtle Inc., director. 1947 Clip of an Arribada — What Healthy Sea Turtle Populations Should Look like!! Youtube, Youtube, 27 July 2014, www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1hoIxrAcQ8#action=share.
Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife. “Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle.” Species Profile for Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle (Lepidochelys Kempii), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/profile/speciesProfile?sId=5523.


Saving the Endangered Pygmy Rabbit_SzillinskyJoseph

Saving the Endangered 
Pygmy Rabbit
The Pygmy Rabbit belongs to a family called Leporidae which contains over 60 species of various rabbits and hares. Some characteristics of this family include:
Species range from approximately 300 grams – 5 kg in weight
Long hind legs & shorter fore legs
Four toes equipped with strong claws and hairy foot-soles to improve grip
Excellent hearing
Exceptional night vision for a nocturnal/twilight lifestyle
To learn more about the Leporidae family: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leporidae
Habits & Habitat
In size it ranks the smallest species of Leporidae, but Pygmy rabbits are one of only two native rabbit species in North America that dig their own burrow. Because of their tendency towards this, pygmy rabbits seek out deep loose soil. Their historical distribution is primarily found in areas of big sagebrush, not only because it yields optimal soil conditions, but also because the big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentate) was found to be their primary food source.
Historical Distribution
Pygmy Rabbits can however, inhabit a variety of semiarid shrub areas that have been found scattered throughout their historical distribution in the Great Basin, and parts of California, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana.
The pygmy rabbit has lived in this area for over 100,000 years, but due to their dependence on large areas of soft soil and tall grass as well as their “home range” of only 30 meters – 7 acres depending on season, their distribution across a range has always been soil dependent and spotty.


Threats
Before the arrival of settlers in America the habitat of Pygmy Rabbits would shift, affecting population and location, in response to natural weather patterns, wildfires, or other natural causes. When one habitat was destroyed it would either grow back, or the population would seek out another area that met their needs. However, with the arrival of settlers the landscape of their former home began to change and large areas of semiarid shrub were transformed into cities, roads, or even domestic grass that “looks prettier” but cannot support the Pygmy.
Identified Threats: Recovery Plan (2012)
It is no surprise then that the current primary listed threat to Pygmy Rabbits is defined as “The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range” (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012). This is seen as a result of growing agriculture development, infrastructure development, and increased fire frequency which poses a direct threat to big sagebrush.
Various additional threats have been identified and included in the recovery plan but are relatively mild in comparison to the first threat, which is primarily where resources and actions aim to focus. These additional threats are listed above as factors B-D (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012).
Recovery Plan Development
The original “Draft Recovery Plan” for the Pygmy Rabbit was completed in August of 2007 and composed by a team of various conservation specialists and students. It was not until 2011 however that the amendment to the plan was developed resulting in the official recovery plan that is available now. The recovery strategy is first broken into 3 general phases (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012 “Recovery Plan for the Columbia Basin Distinct Population Segment of the Pygmy Rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis)”):
1.) Removal or abatement of imminent threats to the population and the potentially suitable shrub steppe habitats in the Columbia Basin
2.) Reestablishment of an appropriate number and distribution of free-ranging subpopulations over the near term
3.) Establishment and protection of a sufficiently resilient, free-ranging population that would be expected to withstand foreseeable long-term threats.


Recovery Plan Efforts
With the physical goal of the recovery plan aiming to move the pygmy rabbits from the Federal “Endangered List” to the federal “threatened list” these strategies are broken down further into specific actions. This plan identifies 9 steps of action to aid the recovery of Pygmy rabbits in the Columbia Basin, and are identified as follows (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012 “Recovery Plan for the Columbia Basin Distinct Population Segment of the Pygmy Rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis)”):
Action 1: Manage partially controlled field-breeding for the Columbia Basin pygmy rabbit.
Action 2: Reestablish free-ranging Columbia Basin pygmy rabbit subpopulations within their historical distribution.
Action 3: Survey for, monitor, and assess free-ranging Columbia Basin pygmy rabbits.
Action 4: Protect free-ranging Columbia Basin pygmy rabbits.
Action 5: Manage habitats at recovery emphasis areas and intervening properties (as viii feasible) to support stable, self-sustaining subpopulations of free-ranging Columbia Basin pygmy rabbits.
Action 6: Pursue conservation agreements for the Columbia Basin pygmy rabbit with landowners and managers of intervening properties within the population’s historical distribution.
Action 7: Exchange information with stakeholders and the general public to address concerns and increase support for Columbia Basin pygmy rabbit recovery efforts.
Action 8: Secure funding for Columbia Basin pygmy rabbit recovery efforts.
Action 9: Revise this Federal Recovery Plan to facilitate implementation of adaptive management measures considered necessary to achieve the phased recovery strategy population fluctuations.
How you can make a difference
In geographic areas within and surrounding the historical range of Pygmy Rabbit habitat meetings between federal agencies, conservation agencies, land owners, and concerned citizens are held as needed to discuss efforts and progress. These meetings are open to anyone, and can provide anyone a voice to directly impact the Recovery Plan. As a majority of the world does not reside in this area however, there are many other actions concerned individuals can take to positively affect their recovery. Raising awareness through social media is a great approach as it often can trigger a chain reaction. Another action individual can take would be a donation to a conservation agency that supports this recovery plan in one of the locations mentioned above, such as the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Donations can aid in purchasing protected plots of land for the Pygmy Rabbits to recover, or funding additional efforts described in the Recovery Plan.
As was summarized in the recovery plan “Recovery of the Columbia Basin pygmy rabbit will require both effective adaptive management through comprehensive monitoring and sustained conservation measures to ensure the population’s long-term viability.” ( U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012). By spreading awareness and installing dynamic recovery efforts, we have the power to save the Pygmy Rabbit from endangerment, and ultimately extinction. Let’s do this!


Sources & Resources


U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012. Recovery Plan for the Columbia Basin Distinct Population Segment of the    Pygmy Rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis). Portland, Oregon. ix + 109 pp.